|
|
Neo-Calvinism[size=0.875em]From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to searchThis article is about the Dutch Calvinist movement. For the movement that emerged in the late 20th-century U.S., see New Calvinism.
Neo-Calvinism, a form of Dutch Calvinism, is the movement initiated by the theologianand former Dutch prime minister Abraham Kuyper. James Bratt has identified a number of different types of Dutch Calvinism: The Seceders, split into the Reformed Church "West" and the Confessionalists; the Neo-Calvinists; and the Positives and the Antithetical Calvinists. The Seceders were largely infralapsarian and the Neo-Calvinists usually supralapsarian. [1][ page needed] Kuyper wanted to awaken the church from what he viewed as its pietistic slumber. He declared: No single piece of our mental world is to be sealed off from the rest and there is not a square inch in the whole domain of human existence over which Christ, who is sovereign over all, does not cry: 'Mine!' [2][ page needed] [3]
This refrain has become something of a rallying call for Neo-Calvinists. Contents
Emphases of Neo-Calvinism[edit]- Jesus is Lord over all of creation. Jesus’ Lordship extends through every area and aspect of life – it is not restricted to the sphere of church or of personal piety.
- The idea that all of life is to be redeemed.The work of Jesus on the cross extends over all of life – no area is exempt from its impact. All knowledge is affected by the true knowledge of God through redemption in Christ.[5]
- Cultural Mandate. Genesis 1:26–28 has been described as a cultural mandate. It is the mandate to cultivate and develop the creation.[6] There is a historical development and cultural unfolding. Some Neo-Calvinists hold that the Cultural Mandate is as important as the Great Commission.[7]
- Creation, fall and redemption. God’s good creation has been disrupted by the fall. Redemption is a restoration of creation.[8]
- Sphere sovereignty (Soevereiniteit in eigen kring). Each sphere (or sector) of life has its own distinct responsibilities and authority as designed by God – for instance, communities dedicated to worship, civil justice, agriculture, family, etc. – and no one area of life is sovereign over another. Hence, neither faith-institutions nor an institution of civil justice (that is, the state) should seek totalitarian control or any regulation of human activity outside their limited competence.[9]
- A rejection of dualism. Dualisms are (purportedly false) bifurcations, dichotomies, contrasts, or oppositions, such as the dualism between nature and grace that [allegedly] dominated much of Scholasticism. In the Neo-Calvinist view, nature is the God-created and sustained cosmic order, not a "non-supernatural" category, and grace is God's means of renewing the cosmic order, it is not something "non-creational" added onto nature (albeit eschatological in consummated glorification of bodily resurrection to eternal life and cosmic transformation of the new heavens and earth).
- Structure and direction. Structure denotes created laws and norms for (other) created things. Direction denotes relative deviation or conformity to norms; primarily regarding the central orientation of the human heart toward or away from God in Christ.[10]
- Common grace. God providentially sustains the created order, restraining of possible evils and giving non-salvific good gifts to all humanity despite their fall into sin, God's curse, and his eventual condemnation of the unredeemed.[11]
- Presuppositional apologetics. The only framework in which any fact about the world is intelligible is the Christian worldview in general, and the theologically Reformedworldview in particular. The principles of logic and the use of reason assume the existence of God. Presuppositionalism is a reductio ad absurdum approach to Christian apologetics, in that it attempts to demonstrate that all non-Christian worldviews are internally inconsistent.
- The antithesis. There is a struggle in history and within every person – between submission to and rebellion against God; between the kingdom of light and the kingdom of darkness; between the age to come (already inaugurated in Christ) and this present evil age (of sin).[12]
- World views. Neo-Calvinists reject the notion that theoretical thought can be religiously neutral. All thinking and practice is shaped by world views and religious ground motives. For the Neo-Calvinist, life in all its aspects can be shaped by a distinctively Christian world view.[13]
- The role of law. For Neo-Calvinists, "Law" is more than the Mosaic Decalogue, or even the entire abiding moral will of God. Law is, rather, the order for creation (or creation ordinances) established by God and includes a variety of types of cultural norms including physiological, psychological, logical, historical, linguistic, social, economic, aesthetic, juridical, and faith norms.
Key individuals associated with Neo-Calvinism[edit]Neo-Calvinist institutions and organizations[edit]- Arrowhead Christian Academy in Redlands, California
- Calvin College, Grand Rapids, MI
- Cardus (formerly known as The Work Research Foundation), Hamilton, ON, CA
- The Center for Public Justice
- The Christian Labour Association of Canada[dubious – discuss]
- CCO (Coalition for Christian Outreach), Pittsburgh, PA
- Dordt College, Sioux Center, IA, USA.
- Free University in Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Theological University of the Reformed Churches in Kampen, the Netherlands
- Institute for Christian Studies, Toronto, CA
- Kuyper College
- Kuyper Foundation
- Geneva College, Beaver Falls, PA
- Covenant College, Lookout Mtn, GA
- Redeemer University College, Ancaster, ON, CA
- Trinity Christian College, Palos Heights, IL
- The Kings College, Edmonton, Alberta, CA
- Faculté Jean Calvin, Aix-en-Provence, France
Key texts[edit]- Bavinck, Herman, Reformed Dogmatics.
- Kuyper, Abraham, Calvinism: Stone Lectures.
Notes[edit]- ^ Bratt 1984.
- ^ McGoldrick 2000.
- ^ Inaugural Lecture, Free University of Amsterdam, 1880.
- ^ Bishop, Steve, "Neocalvinst distinctives", An accidental blog, Google.
- ^ Frey, Bradshaw; et al. (1983), All of Life Redeemed: Biblical Insights for Daily Obedience, Ontario: Paideia Press.
- ^ Spykman 1992, p. 109.
- ^ Colson & Pearcey 1999, p. 295.
- ^ Melleby, Derek, Neo-Calvinism 101, Vanguard church, archived from the original on 2009-08-19.
- ^ Kuyper, Abraham (1998), "Sphere Sovereignty", in Bratt, James D, Abraham Kuyper: A Centennial Reader, Grand Rapids: William B Eerdmans.
- ^ Wolters 2005, chapter 5.
- ^ Mouw, Richard (2002), He Shines in all that's Fair, Grand Rapids: William B Eerdmans.
- ^ Spykman 1992, p. 65.
- ^ Marshall, Paul A; et al., eds. (1989), Stained Glass: Worldviews and Social Science, Toronto: University Press of America.
Further reading[edit]- Bratt, James (1984) [Eerdmans], Dutch Calvinism in Modern America, Wipf and Stock.
- ——— (1997), "The Dutch Schools", in Wells, David F, Reformed Theology in America, Baker.
- Colson, Chuck; Pearcey, Nancy (1999), How Now Shall We Live?, Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House, p. 295.
- Dennison, William D. (June 1999). "Neo-Calvinism and the Roots for Transformation: An Introductory Essay" (PDF). Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society. 42 (2): 271–291.
- McGoldrick, James E (2000), Abraham Kuyper: God’s Renaissance Man, Welwyn, UK: Evangelical Press.
- Mouw, Richard J (1989), "Dutch Calvinist philosophical influences in North America", Calvin Theological Journal, 24 (1): 93–120.
- Spykman, Gordon J (1992), Reformational Theology: A New Paradigm for Doing Dogmatics, Grand Rapids: William B Eerdmans.
- Wolters, Albert M (2005) [1985], Creation Regained: Biblical Basics for a Reformational Worldview (2nd ed.), Grand Rapids: William B Eerdmans, ISBN 0-8028-2969-4.
|
|
发表于 2020-6-21 21:29:22
olitics]Politics portal[/url]